The reality of being a scientist is that not all papers are going to be accepted. However, there are times when one may not completely agree as to why a paper got rejected. A recent post by Jerry Fagerberg at CellPress discusses how to start a conversation with editors about their decision.
A pre-submission inquiry can be a useful tool to determine if a journal may be interested in your manuscript before a full submission.
Here, Fatima Qureshi, a Junior Content Writer and Editor for Editage Insights, highlights tips for writing an effective pre-submission inquiry.
An innovative method for publishing, called Registered Reports, utilizes peer review and a decision to publish that precedes data collection and analysis.
Check out the full article here:
Nature 571, 447 (2019)
Have you ever wondered if a journal has open peer review? Or if a journal allows co-reviewing by students and post-docs? It can seem as if this information is impossible to find. Transpose is a new database aimed at making journal editorial policies more transparent and accessible.
So… you worked hard on your paper. You ran the experiments and wrote up the results. You got the cover letter just right, and you made sure to polish the title, the abstract, and the figures . Finally, you submitted your work to a journal, and a few days later you received an email letting you know that the editors have sent your work out for peer review!
And now … you wait.
By Ben Tolkin
Manuscripts may have a rigidly defined structure, but there’s still room to tell a compelling story — one that clearly communicates the science and is a pleasure to read. Scientist-authors and editors debate the importance and meaning of creativity and offer tips on how to write a top paper.
by Virginia Gewin
A career in science requires one to wear many hats: bench scientist, mentor, writer, teacher, graphic designer, public speaker, etc. Therefore, effective time management is essential for a successful career in research. In a recent career column in Nature, Andrew Johnson and John Sumpter outline six tips at being a better manager of your time.
Modern science is often based on statements of statistical significance and probability. A select group of scientists have proposed that the scientific community needs to move the P value threshold from 0.05 to 0.005. What are your thoughts?
In Part 2 of Dr. Audra Cox’s series “Can You Trust What You Read?”, she highlights common problems with the presentation of images and figures including image manipulation, proper image acquisition, and ways to ensure image accuracy.
“Integrity without knowledge is weak and useless, and knowledge without integrity is dangerous and dreadful”
In Part 1 of her series entitled “Can You Trust What You Read?”, Dr. Audra Cox discusses the important topic of plagiarism.